As you may imagine, a Vioxx attorney is an attorney who deals with seeking to get compensation and correcting the wrongs brought on by the drug on users. This is a drug meant to treat arthritis and the attorney can help someone affected by the drug to receive compensation from the drug's manufacturers. It is common for such an attorney to be experienced in defective drug law.
At one time the drug was considered to be the answer to many of the issues that arose from the family of diseases that fell under the label arthritis. Unfortunately the effects of this medication have, in many cases, proven worse than the symptoms of the disease it was meant to treat. Its use has been tied directly to an increase in the risk of heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, liver damage, kidney failure, high blood pressure, and sudden death.
Moreover it is thought to provoke allergic reactions that involve swelling of the face, lips, tongue, and throat. Such reactions can, in turn, interfere with breathing or swallowing. FDA reports indicate that Vioxx is also related to cases of a non-bacterial type of meningitis. Even though rare, this side effect is at least as serious as bacterial meningitis itself.
It has a non-existent history in the drug market because of the dishonesty and negative effects associated with its use. The Merck Company is the manufacturer of this drug and it received a license to sell it in 1999. Over twenty million Americans have used this drug since that year. But, two years had hardly passed when the FDA communicated with Merck seeking explanation on why their drug caused many negative side effects.
It seems that during tests meant to compare this drug with another painkiller called naproxen "potentially serious cardiovascular findings" were observed. Patients taking Vioxx were observed to have a four to five-fold increase" in heart attacks, compared to another control group taking naproxen.
Merck consistently downplayed or denied such findings until its own testing uncovered the evident fact that people on the drug for longer than 18 months were two times more likely to suffer a heart attack or a stroke compared to those given a placebo. Merck voluntarily removed it from the market on September 30, 2004. This sorry history eventually lead to a great tide of lawsuits once the obvious health risks linked to the drug could not be denied.
It is still not clear whether the removal of this drug from the market is a way to admit liability. In fact, Merck claims that the proof of Vioxx causing health risks only appeared after five years since the licensing of the drug and after three years from the first case of health issues happening due to using the drug.
You may be among the 20 million people in the US who have taken this drug at some point and if you are experiencing any of the symptoms outlined above you may have a rightful claim for damages. If any loved one took the drug and suffered illness or death from any of the harmful outcomes of it stated earlier you could have a claim as well.
You must contact a Vioxx attorney at your earliest convenience .
At one time the drug was considered to be the answer to many of the issues that arose from the family of diseases that fell under the label arthritis. Unfortunately the effects of this medication have, in many cases, proven worse than the symptoms of the disease it was meant to treat. Its use has been tied directly to an increase in the risk of heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, liver damage, kidney failure, high blood pressure, and sudden death.
Moreover it is thought to provoke allergic reactions that involve swelling of the face, lips, tongue, and throat. Such reactions can, in turn, interfere with breathing or swallowing. FDA reports indicate that Vioxx is also related to cases of a non-bacterial type of meningitis. Even though rare, this side effect is at least as serious as bacterial meningitis itself.
It has a non-existent history in the drug market because of the dishonesty and negative effects associated with its use. The Merck Company is the manufacturer of this drug and it received a license to sell it in 1999. Over twenty million Americans have used this drug since that year. But, two years had hardly passed when the FDA communicated with Merck seeking explanation on why their drug caused many negative side effects.
It seems that during tests meant to compare this drug with another painkiller called naproxen "potentially serious cardiovascular findings" were observed. Patients taking Vioxx were observed to have a four to five-fold increase" in heart attacks, compared to another control group taking naproxen.
Merck consistently downplayed or denied such findings until its own testing uncovered the evident fact that people on the drug for longer than 18 months were two times more likely to suffer a heart attack or a stroke compared to those given a placebo. Merck voluntarily removed it from the market on September 30, 2004. This sorry history eventually lead to a great tide of lawsuits once the obvious health risks linked to the drug could not be denied.
It is still not clear whether the removal of this drug from the market is a way to admit liability. In fact, Merck claims that the proof of Vioxx causing health risks only appeared after five years since the licensing of the drug and after three years from the first case of health issues happening due to using the drug.
You may be among the 20 million people in the US who have taken this drug at some point and if you are experiencing any of the symptoms outlined above you may have a rightful claim for damages. If any loved one took the drug and suffered illness or death from any of the harmful outcomes of it stated earlier you could have a claim as well.
You must contact a Vioxx attorney at your earliest convenience .
About the Author:
NY construction accident attorneys specialize in winning you the compensation you deserve. Follow the hyperlink for more information on NY vioxx lawyers.
No comments:
Post a Comment